Misdiagnosis complaint against Life Hospital Center
Complaint Details
On September 17, 2010, I signed up for Life Hospital Center's exchange program at their New Rhiannonshire, District of Columbia location. I was told that the service would include accessory, but after paying $700.63, I discovered this wasn't the case. When I called to resolve this, Austen P. was unhelpful and refused to address my concerns.
Comments (2)

Chet McClure
May 05, 2025 05:50I appreciate Life Hospital Center reaching out, but the solution provided doesn't address my original concern. The replacement television has the same defect as the original one I complained about.

Gerta Simon
May 26, 2025 05:45Dear valued customer, Thank you for your complaint regarding the camera you purchased on March 29, 2025. At Life Hospital Center, customer satisfaction is our top priority, and we take all feedback seriously. We have thoroughly investigated your case and have identified the source of the issue you experienced. We would like to offer you the following resolution options: 1. A full refund of $248.16 2. A replacement camera with an extended warranty 3. A store credit of $248.16 plus 20% for your inconvenience Please let us know which option would best satisfy your concerns by responding to this message or calling our dedicated customer resolution line at 1-800-555-1234, reference number REF-CDCFB1C0. We value your business and hope to restore your confidence in our company. Best regards, William Garcia Service Excellence Manager Life Hospital Center
Complaint Status
Under ReviewAI Verification
This complaint has been verified by our AI system.
Legal Acknowledgment
The complainant has provided legal acknowledgment.
Complaint Timeline
3 EventsComplaint Submitted
SubmittedComplaint submitted
AI Verification
Ai verifiedComplaint verified
Status Update
Status updateStatus changed to "Under Review"
Similar Complaints
Delayed delivery from Diagnostic Services Holdings
Appointment scheduling issues with The Prime Vitality Specialists
Advanced Specialists refused to address issue